Like The Prisoner, the hierarchs of the Societe Generale will designate them by numbers, which creates a particularly warm climate. In the case of Jerome Kerviel, we have, in order of increasing responsibility, N +1, N +2, etc.. Until the Director General, N 7. Hence the paradoxical equation that seeks to resolve the criminal court of Paris against a chain of command if expanded and a financial disaster without precedent: (N +1) + (N 2) … + (N +7) =- 4.9 billion euros in January 2008.
Here, at the helm, N +1. A tall, friendly, very thin uniform N + (gray suit, blue tie), polytechnician ruffled the soft look. In real life, he called Eric Cordelle, 38, married, two children. Societe Generale was dismissed in April 2008 and is currently "looking for a job."What is immediately striking is that it does not seem really for the post of Chief of Jerome Kerviel and seven other traders that he agreed in April 2007: expert financial engineering, back from Japan He knows neither the language nor the tricks of trading – exactly the opposite profile of its predecessor. Hence the hypothesis raised by the prosecution, that Mr. Kerviel would have easily eaten secretly by investing 50 billion euros.
What is striking then, is how little energy spent by N +1 to the detection of internal fraud. But N 2, we hear just now, as N 7 and N 6, previously interviewed, was no more ardent. It even comes to say that SocGen was on this point, less vigilant than the first quarter came drugstore. Its controls? A Maginot Line which Kerviel was played, and that his motive remains indecipherable is a poor excuse."A trader can not leave with the cash, 'explains Mr. Cordelle. Let. But why did we not informed, inviting him to greater scrutiny, the 2005 incident, which saw the apprentice trader Kerviel win 500 payday loan lenders.000 euros speculating as Allianz, then he did not have the right? Why does no one consults he never or almost Eliot software, which records all transactions (actual or fictitious) of his subordinate? Why is not the intended recipient of two letters from Eurex, the end of 2007, in which the German derivatives market to demand explanations on SocGen excessive operations implemented by Jerome Kerviel?
True, Mr.Cordelle gives the impression of having been "thrown into the lion's den," with Jerome Kerviel who has "been acting" with a real talent since "every time he explained something, it was credible . We want to believe it was lost in the maquis computer "- the formula is the president Pauthe – in which Mr. Kerviel, he, played as a fish in water.
"To find, we must seek"
But still, the Ecole Polytechnique has an easy to hide behind the situation – activity increase exponentially, inadequate staffing, etc … The fact is that it does not, in particular, read all the emails or bookkeeping, Perhaps it would put a flea in his ear. To him as to his superiors. Therefore the bank as a system, a system so sure of himself that he did not think to detect a free electron, which methodically undermined its own foundations."To find, we must look," says Mr. Cordelle, but this truism leaves the court on his hunger. For if one man could commit 50 billion euros without anyone noticing, jeopardizing a financial institution, its shareholders and its 150,000 employees, What were the controls? Why so many "N"?
READ ALSO:
"Trial Kerviel:" They are all guilty! "
Jerome Kerviel admits to having produced false
For his boss, Kerviel was a "criminal behavior"